🦺 DETAILED NOTES
1️⃣ Introduction
Footwear is an essential component of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in mining operations. Earlier, DGMS approved footwear types to ensure safety in coal, metalliferous, and oil mines. Now, by a special written order, the system of DGMS approval for footwear has been discontinued, provided the footwear conforms to relevant BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards) norms.
2️⃣ Background
Earlier, DGMS used to issue product-wise approvals to ensure safety against hazards like impact and compression, electrical resistance, penetration, and chemical exposure. Now, the emphasis has shifted to BIS certification and mine-level verification, reducing administrative dependency.
3️⃣ Key DGMS Circular Highlights
- DGMS no longer provides footwear approvals individually.
 - Mine management is responsible for ensuring compliance.
 - BIS certified footwear (IS 15298) is mandatory.
 - DGMS may issue discontinuation or restriction orders in writing if unsafe products are found.
 
4️⃣ Applicable Legal Framework
| Act / Rule / Regulation | Provision Description | 
|---|---|
| Mines Act, 1952 (Sec. 18) | Power of DGMS to issue special orders | 
| Mines Rules, 1955 (Rule 126) | PPE and protective clothing requirements | 
| CMR 2017 (Reg. 123) | Safety equipment in coal mines | 
| DGMS Circular 2020/01 | Simplified PPE compliance | 
| IS 15298 (Part 2 & 3) | Indian Standard for safety footwear | 
5️⃣ Compliance Guidelines
- Purchase footwear only from BIS-licensed manufacturers.
 - Verify IS 15298 marking on the product.
 - Maintain supplier’s test certificates.
 - Replace worn or damaged footwear immediately.
 - DGMS inspectors can withdraw unsafe models through a written order.
 
6️⃣ Advantages of Discontinuance
- Simplified compliance
 - Encourages local manufacturing
 - Reduces DGMS administrative workload
 - Ensures continuous safety verification by management
 
⚡ QUICK ONE-LINERS
- DGMS no longer approves footwear individually.
 - Mines must use BIS-certified safety shoes.
 - IS 15298 defines safety footwear standards.
 - Approval discontinuance was done by a written order.
 - Mine manager ensures PPE compliance.
 - DGMS may still issue special safety bans.
 - PPE rules are in Rule 126 of Mines Rules, 1955.
 - BIS replaces DGMS type approval.
 - PPE inspection is mandatory every 6 months.
 - DGMS retains power to stop unsafe PPE.
 
🧠 DESCRIPTIVE MODEL QUESTION & ANSWER
Q. Explain the DGMS decision to discontinue footwear approval and state the new compliance requirements for mines.
Answer:
                        DGMS earlier approved safety footwear used in mines to ensure protection against impact, penetration, and heat. However, due to the availability of high-quality BIS-certified footwear, DGMS discontinued its individual approval system through a special order in writing. Now, mine managements must procure footwear conforming to IS 15298 (Part 2 & 3) and maintain test certificates. DGMS retains authority to restrict unsafe products under Section 18 of the Mines Act, 1952.
References: Mines Act, 1952 (Sec. 18); Mines Rules, 1955 (Rule 126); IS 15298 (Part 2 & 3).
Conclusion: This move simplifies compliance while maintaining worker safety and accountability at mine level.
🎯 25 DGMS MCQs (Dynamic Options with Solutions)
Q1. Under which section of the Mines Act does DGMS issue special orders regarding safety equipment?
Q2. DGMS discontinued approval of helmets used in mines subject to compliance with which Indian Standard?
Q3. BIS stands for:
Q4. Helmets must have which marking to be acceptable for use in mines?
Q5. DGMS can discontinue helmet usage by:
Q6. Which Rule of the Mines Rules, 1955 mandates protective equipment for workers?
Q7. Helmets for mining personnel must resist:
Q8. Which of the following is responsible for helmet inspection in mines?
Q9. What should be the minimum replacement period for mining helmets?
Q10. IS 2925:1984 helmets must pass which test?
Q11. The discontinuance order primarily relies on the effectiveness of:
Q12. Who is responsible for procuring BIS-certified helmets?
Q13. If a DGMS inspector finds a BIS-certified helmet unsafe during use, they can:
Q14. The shift from DGMS approval to BIS certification aims to:
Q15. IS 2925 covers helmets for which type of use?
Q16. Records related to helmet procurement and testing should be available for:
Q17. A damaged BIS-certified helmet should be:
Q18. The "Reaffirmed 2010" status for IS 2925:1984 means:
Q19. Which part of the helmet provides primary impact protection?
Q20. The discontinuance of DGMS approval places more emphasis on:
Q21. The Mines Rules, 1955 are made under the powers given by which Act?
Q22. Mine management must ensure helmets are suitable for:
Q23. The color coding of helmets in mines often indicates:
Q24. Maintaining helmets involves:
Q25. The shift to BIS standards promotes:
🔗 INTERNAL LINKS
| Related Topic | Read More On... | 
|---|---|
| PPE in Mines | Behavioural Safety, Health & Welfare | 
| Mine Safety Circulars | DGMS Tech Circular No. 02 of 2020 | 
| Mines Act | Mines Act, 1952 Simplified - Key Provisions | 
| Safety Management | DGMS Role in Safety Plans | 
💡 Prepare Smarter for DGMS Exams!
Get free access to updated notes, DGMS circulars, and 10,000+ MCQs.
- Comprehensive DGMS Notes
 - Latest Circular Updates
 - Extensive MCQ Bank
 
👉 www.onlineminingexam.com
📞 Call/WhatsApp: 9971114020

